<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Broadbean and the end of the job boards?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whatjobsite.com/blog/2009/12/broadbean-and-the-end-of-the-job-boards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whatjobsite.com/blog/2009/12/broadbean-and-the-end-of-the-job-boards/</link>
	<description>Your Guide to Online Recruitment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 09:22:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: WJS</title>
		<link>http://www.whatjobsite.com/blog/2009/12/broadbean-and-the-end-of-the-job-boards/#comment-1582</link>
		<dc:creator>WJS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatjobsite.com/blog/?p=254#comment-1582</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the clarification and I appreciate your taking the time to comment. It seems the phrase &quot;Traditionally, Broadbean used to charge job boards a small fee (a couple of hundred pounds)...&quot; is inaccurate and apologies for this. However, a number of job boards have reported a hike in &quot;quoted&quot; pricing. Perhaps these are &quot;offers&quot; and &quot;deals&quot; that were offered under certain conditions and thus pricing reverted to rate when they weren&#039;t taken. Whichever the case, thanks for the clarification.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the clarification and I appreciate your taking the time to comment. It seems the phrase &#8220;Traditionally, Broadbean used to charge job boards a small fee (a couple of hundred pounds)&#8230;&#8221; is inaccurate and apologies for this. However, a number of job boards have reported a hike in &#8220;quoted&#8221; pricing. Perhaps these are &#8220;offers&#8221; and &#8220;deals&#8221; that were offered under certain conditions and thus pricing reverted to rate when they weren&#8217;t taken. Whichever the case, thanks for the clarification.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan McGuire</title>
		<link>http://www.whatjobsite.com/blog/2009/12/broadbean-and-the-end-of-the-job-boards/#comment-1581</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan McGuire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatjobsite.com/blog/?p=254#comment-1581</guid>
		<description>Dan McGuire here. Just to clarify a couple of points on this....
We charge a one off fee of £3,995 for integration. This fee was introduced in June 2008, months before the acquisition and the two are not linked. We have been charging for feeds since early 2004. 
Feel free to mail me direct on this matter dan@broadbean.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan McGuire here. Just to clarify a couple of points on this&#8230;.<br />
We charge a one off fee of £3,995 for integration. This fee was introduced in June 2008, months before the acquisition and the two are not linked. We have been charging for feeds since early 2004.<br />
Feel free to mail me direct on this matter <a href="mailto:dan@broadbean.com">dan@broadbean.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

