Job boards and the tyranny of statistics

Telegraph Media Group’s digital editor, Edward Roussel, is reported in the Grauniad as saying that they are moving away from unique users as a driving objective of its online business and, instead, are going to focus on the  “three Cs”: content, commerce and clubs. In other words, for the Telegraph it’s no longer about the stats: it’s what you do with people.

Oddly, very recently whatjobsite had a heated argument (which we lost) with an independent job boarder over the use of stats in selling online recruitment advertising. Their point was similar. It’s not the volume of unique users that matter, but the people. It’s quality and relevance.

It seems obvious really. Why should unique users or application stats matter for someone trying to fill a job? 100 applicants for a job from one job board is no better than 2 applications from another — if it is from the latter that the hire comes.

And yet, all we hear about is statistics. And even whatjobsite profiles perpetuate this tendency — which is why we lost the argument.  How did we get to the point that we are judging job boards on volume stats? When did ABCe audits so important? And why?

Well, in truth, ABCe audits are tools for marketers and media buyers to assess competing media as advertising options. The more eyeballs, goes the logic, the better. Recruitment advertising agencies will contest this claim, I am sure. But job boarders themselves will know that recruitment advertising agencies used to love their stats. How many unique user in x job in y location at z salary etc was often a question in a booking call. How many clickthroughs could be expected? What can we do to increase page views?

It was the desire to attract the valuable advertising agency market that made job boards start quoting stats. Once they started quoting stats, however, they then had to do audits to verify them. Later, as recruitment agencies professionalised their online activities, stats became KPIs for them too. Little by little, without anybody really noticing, stats became the de facto assessment criteria of job boards.

Now we face the sad truth that ABCe audits and Hitwise are little more than badges for effective search engine marketing. Job boards choose when they want to be audited. Turn on a Pay Per Click advertising campaign for a month and get your new flashy “audit.” For large generalist sites, it can sometimes be just a week.  But what does it really mean? How much of this traffic is real? How much is relevant?

More important, for the average SME or company with a job to advertise, these stats are meaningless. Even the Guardian uses the misleading word  ‘Hits’ in the title of the piece. For SME employers there is only one stat that matters: 1 successful hire. What could be better than one job view, one application and one hire?



  • http://www.broadbean.com Rayanne Thorn

    Good and valid points. Which is why understanding job boards performance is so relevant. Breaking down your unique job board stats, to fully understand the impact of your spend is imperative and can only be deemed wise. Why would you blindly post adverts? To blindly hope the perfect candidate sees it?

    You need to know the return. Is there a return on the time and money spent on posting adverts? How do you know?

    As a recruiter, corporate or otherwise, it is your responsibility to know results of your spend and then being able to even justify your existence. If you can’t do either, know and justify, then you can in no way, understand the “use impact” of job boards to your company/business.

    • http://www.whatjobsite.com WJS

      Good points that will have relevance for professional recruiters. Indeed, any professional recruiter will probably have such metrics and KPIs in place. Indeed, I would hazard that it was these professional recruiters that pushed job boards in the direction of getting “applications” audited.

      But again, this is just more statistics. Valid though they are. I still suspect that they will be both alien and irrelevant for the small direct recruiter. You can only get such stats if you have already posted jobs. So it’s a snapshot in hindsight. And, for the company that is posting ten or fifteen jobs a year it’s unlikely that they will have an ATS that tracks applications and placements.

      I suppose what we are really looking is the killer stat: hires per job ad. Or something like that. But how, as a job board, do you get your hands on that stat?